翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Ohira ・ Ohiri Field ・ Ohis ・ Ohisama ・ Ohio Union ・ Ohio University ・ Ohio University Aquatic Center ・ Ohio University College of Arts and Sciences ・ Ohio University Eastern Campus ・ Ohio University Press ・ Ohio University Southern Campus ・ Ohio University Women's Center ・ Ohio University – Chillicothe ・ Ohio University – Zanesville ・ Ohio v. Clark ・ Ohio v. Roberts ・ Ohio v. Robinette ・ Ohio Valley and Eastern Ohio Regional Transportation Authority ・ Ohio Valley Association of the Christian Baptist Churches of God ・ Ohio Valley Athletic Conference ・ Ohio Valley Career and Technical Center ・ Ohio Valley Conference ・ Ohio Valley Conference Baseball Tournament ・ Ohio Valley Conference Men's Basketball Player of the Year ・ Ohio Valley Electric Corporation ・ Ohio Valley Electric Railway ・ Ohio Valley Emmy Awards ・ Ohio Valley Greyhounds ・ Ohio Valley Hospital ・ Ohio Valley in Kentucky Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Ohio v. Roberts ： ウィキペディア英語版 Ohio v. Roberts ''Ohio v. Roberts'', 448 U.S. 56 (1980), is a United States Supreme Court decision dealing with the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. == Factual background == Herschel Roberts was charged with forgery of a check and with possession of stolen credit cards. At the preliminary hearing, defense counsel called the victims' daughter to the stand and tried to elicit from her an admission that she provided defendant with the checks and the credit card but failed to inform the defendant that she did not have permission to use them. Counsel was unable to elicit this admission nor did the prosecutor cross-examine the witness. The daughter was subpoenaed five times but never appeared for trial. At trial, the defendant testified that the daughter had given him her parents' checkbook and credit cards with the understanding he could use them. The State, on rebuttal, offered the transcript of the daughter's testimony pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code Ann. Section 2945.49 (1975) which permits the use of preliminary examination testimony of a witness who “cannot for any reason be produced at trial.” The defense objected asserting that use of the transcript violated the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution (incorporated to the States under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution). The trial court admitted the transcript and the defendant was convicted. The Supreme Court of Ohio overturned the conviction. That court held that the daughter's absence at trial and the lack of cross-examination at the preliminary hearing violated the Confrontation Clause. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Ohio v. Roberts」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.